An interactive essay · AI

RQ-020 — Autoreason & AutoResearch

Self-refinement loops that know when to stop: how Karpathy's AutoResearch and SHL0MS's Autoreason split the work of automating research between objective and subjective domains.

Abstract

Iterative self-refinement with LLMs fails for three structural reasons: prompt bias, scope creep, and lack of restraint. Karpathy’s AutoResearch sidesteps the problem by running against an objective metric. SHL0MS and NousResearch’s Autoreason extends the idea to subjective domains — positioning, copy, strategy — by replacing the metric with an adversarial tournament: an incumbent A, a rival B written without seeing A, and a synthesis AB, all judged by a blind panel via Borda count. If A survives two rounds, the loop halts. This paper synthesizes the method, its empirical capability-value curve, the role of a knowledge layer, and where Autoreason and AutoResearch plug into autonomous-business pipelines like show-1.

The Autoreason tournament

Incumbent A
Rival B written without seeing A
Synthesis AB
Blind panel Borda count
Halt when A survives two rounds

Research Notes

Full Paper

An interactive essay · AI

RQ-020 — Autoreason & AutoResearch · 2026

← Front page